A purpose-built chain for cryptographic compliance verification, evidence integrity, and cross-framework proof —built on the
Secure Controls Framework
SFVT Roadmap 2026 – 2027
A fully automated pipeline that watches the Secure Controls Framework's entire GitHub repository. One commit from SCF triggers our system —and it doesn't stop until every piece of data is hashed, verified, anchored on-chain, and emailed to the team. ~15 minutes, zero human intervention.
Our SCF Monitor watches the official GitHub repository every 60 seconds. The moment a new commit lands, the system detects it within 30 seconds and begins downloading the entire repo —the SCF Excel workbook, all 185 STRM PDFs, every config file. Every single source file is SHA-256 hashed at download and the exact git commit is pinned. The original source data is blockchain-recorded before we touch it.
The SCF workbook is split into individual CSVs: Controls, Assessment Objectives, Risk Catalog, Threat Catalog, Evidence Requests, Domains, Authoritative Sources, Compensating Controls, Privacy Principles, and more. Over 10 raw flat-data CSVs plus relationship CSVs that map how every piece connects. Each CSV is hashed independently.
Every CSV is deterministically normalized —headers to snake_case, encoding standardized, types enforced. The cleaned data is database-ready. Hashed again after cleaning.
4 junction tables are built from the cleaned data, plus all 249 per-framework relationship CSVs. The 185 STRM PDFs are extracted with adaptive header detection and self-healing fallback. Every relationship value is normalized to 5 canonical types: Equal, Subset Of, Superset Of, Intersects With, No Relationship.
249 per-framework mapping CSVs are generated. All flat data, relationship data, and extracted STRM data feed into the SCF Compliance Atlas —a fully logged data model workbook that lets anyone build compliance tooling, dashboards, or reports from a single verified source without any manual data wrangling.
Every piece of derived data is hashed and compared against the previous run. A diff report identifies exactly what changed. All hashes are anchored on-chain via the SFVT contract. The 7-block hash chain and Merkle tree are rebuilt with the new data.
A fully separate audit system re-reads only the original source PDFs, builds its own Merkle tree, and compares it against the main track. Two independent systems, same source, same answer —or the pipeline refuses to produce output. The diff report and full verification results are emailed to the team.
Every piece of compliance evidence —hashed, timestamped, and immutable the moment it's submitted. The #1 audit fraud vector (backdating evidence) dies here.
Every document, scan result, policy, and attestation is SHA-256 hashed on submission. The chain records who submitted it, when, and which control it satisfies.
sha256: 9f3a...b2c1, submitted by [email protected] at block #41,207, satisfying control SCF-AC-01. Six months later, a regulator can verify the exact document was in place on that date.
Each control moves through on-chain states: Not Started, Evidence Submitted, Under Review, Verified, Expired. State transitions are transactions. You can't skip states.
SCF-IRO-04 (Incident Response) transitions: Not Started → Evidence Submitted (pen test report uploaded) → Under Review (auditor assigned) → Verified (auditor signs attestation). Every transition is a timestamped on-chain transaction. No state can be skipped or reversed without a record.
Evidence carries on-chain expiration dates. When evidence expires, the control automatically transitions to Needs Re-Verification. Continuous compliance, not annual snapshots.
SCF-VPM-03 as Expired. The organization's compliance dashboard shows the gap in real time —no human has to remember.
Once anchored, compliance records can't be deleted or altered. If compliance was fraudulent, the on-chain record stands as evidence. You can't "lose" the audit trail.
SCF-CRY-01 was first anchored in March 2026 —two years later than claimed. The immutable record contradicts the fabricated timeline. No exec can order evidence destroyed.
Your SOC 2 audit covers a significant percentage of ISO 27001. Prove it — not with marketing claims, but with Merkle proofs backed by continuously verified framework mappings.
When an organization proves compliance with one framework, the STRM relationship data automatically identifies which controls in other frameworks are also satisfied.
Cryptographically prove what you don't have. "We're X% compliant with ISO 27001 — here's exactly what's missing verified evidence." Nobody else does this.
The same evidence can satisfy controls across multiple frameworks and audit periods. The chain tracks which evidence is used where and calculates coverage efficiency.
SCF-VPM-01 across SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and HIPAA. The chain scores this as 4x coverage — one document, four frameworks. Your total audit effort drops dramatically because the system knows exactly which evidence items overlap.
When a framework updates (new NIST revision, new PCI DSS version), the chain automatically identifies which controls changed and which evidence needs updating.
Auditors sign their reviews on-chain. Multi-party consensus replaces single-point-of-failure compliance verification.
Every auditor signs their review on-chain. You can prove which auditor reviewed which evidence for which control, and when. Auditor independence becomes machine-verifiable.
[email protected] signs attestation for controls SCF-AC-01 through SCF-AC-12 at block #52,401. Her credential shows: certified, no conflicts of interest with the org, last rotation 8 months ago. All verifiable on-chain without asking for paperwork.
Internal audit, external auditor, and automated scans each submit verification independently. The chain requires N-of-M agreement before a control is marked Verified.
SIEM logs, vulnerability scans, cloud config snapshots, and endpoint agents push evidence hashes continuously. Controls verified programmatically get continuous, automatic verification.
When full framework compliance is verified, the chain issues a verifiable attestation containing the Merkle root, framework, date, and auditor signatures. Replaces PDF certificates.
0x7d2f...a91c, 312 controls verified, 3 auditors signed, valid through Dec 2027. Any business partner can verify this in seconds by querying the chain —no PDF, no phone call, no "can you send your SOC 2 report."
A purpose-built blockchain with native compliance primitives. Not ERC-20 hacks on someone else's chain —first-class support for evidence, controls, frameworks, and attestations baked into the protocol itself.
Base and Ethereum are general-purpose chains. Compliance verification needs native data types for controls, evidence, and attestations —not token transfer workarounds. Our own chain means our own consensus rules, our own block times, our own economics, and zero dependency on ETH gas markets.
| Capability | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Native Primitives | Controls, evidence, attestations, and frameworks as first-class data types —not shoehorned into ERC-20 transfers |
| Proof of Audit | Custom consensus where validators are verified auditing firms, not miners or stakers |
| Permissioned Layers | Anyone can verify compliance state publicly; only authorized parties can submit evidence |
| Zero Gas Dependency | Compliance operations shouldn't cost ETH or depend on Ethereum gas market volatility |
| Chain Sovereignty | Control over block times, storage, upgrade paths, and governance —no external protocol risk |
| Cross-Chain Anchoring | Anchor roots to Bitcoin and Base for external trust while operating independently |
| Regulatory Alignment | Build jurisdiction-specific compliance rules directly into the chain protocol |
Zero-knowledge proofs, supply chain compliance inheritance, and an immutable compliance timeline that turns "show me your HIPAA state on March 15" into a block height query.
Prove "we are SOC 2 compliant" without revealing specific evidence or internal controls. ZK proofs verify compliance without exposing operational details.
If your vendor proves SOC 2 on-chain, your audit references their verified state directly —no more requesting SOC 2 reports and hoping they're current. Vendor risk theater dies.
Every SCF version, framework revision, and evidence submission —timestamped forever. "Show me our HIPAA compliance state on March 15, 2025" becomes a block height query.
Aggregate anonymized compliance data across the network to identify industry trends, common gaps, and emerging risks. Organizations benchmark their posture against peers.
From anchoring on Base to running a sovereign compliance chain.
SFVT contract deployed on Base. 100B supply minted. 19 category wallets registered. Dual-track verification live. SFVT Explorer public at frameworkfire.com.
Evidence hashing and chain-of-custody contracts on Base. Compliance state machine for SCF controls. Evidence expiration and continuous compliance enforcement.
On-chain compliance overlap calculations across 249 frameworks. Gap analysis proofs. Coverage scoring engine. Regulatory change detection.
Auditor registration and attestation signing. Multi-party verification consensus. Automated evidence collection pipeline. Verifiable compliance certificates.
Sovereign chain design and testnet. Native compliance data types. Proof of Audit consensus mechanism. Permissioned evidence submission with public verification.
Mainnet launch with cross-chain anchoring to Bitcoin and Base. Migration of all SFVT state to sovereign chain. Zero-knowledge compliance proof integration.
Supply chain compliance inheritance. Compliance intelligence aggregation. Industry benchmarking. The compliance standard becomes the compliance infrastructure.
Nobody else is building cryptographic verification into compliance data at this level. The Secure Controls Framework maps the relationships. SFVT makes them provable.
Explore the Verification Data